Meeting date: 20 jun 2006 Members (asterisk for those attending): *Arpad Muranyi, Intel Corp. *Bob Ross, Teraspeed Consulting Group Todd Westerhoff, Cisco Systems *Mike LaBonte, Cisco Systems Paul Fernando, NCSU Barry Katz, SiSoft Walter Katz, SiSoft Ken Willis, Cadence Design Systems Ian Dodd, Mentor Graphics Lance Wang, Cadence Design Systems *Richard Ward, Texas Instruments Doug White, Cisco Systems Sanjeev Gupta, Agilent Joe Abler, IBM John Shields, Mentor Graphics Ambrish Varma, NCSU Nilesh Kamdar, Agilent Hemant Shah, Cadence Design Systems Jillin Tan, Cadence Design Systems Shangli Wu, Cadence Design Systems C. Kumar, Cadence Design Systems ------------- Review of ARs: - no ARs from last week ------------- - Mike will post Arpad's files to the website archive area as-is. - Documentation - Changes: - Typo in the divider module fixed. - Break statement added to tell simulator when there is a discontinuity switching over to the NearZero algorithm (avoids divide-by-zero). - It would be good to have some user warning when the NearZero algorithm is triggered. - Event riggered modules: - HSPICE use different methods for DC and AC analysis - DC assumes high state above .5 V - AC uses 0.2V and 0.8V to add hysteresis - Order of execution is critical in VHDL-AMS - Gets "stale" EventState value Cadence proposal - Still waiting for details of API. - Probably should not standardize on convultion channel analysis approach. - API accepts waveform in, does DSP and puts out new waveform. - API module needs to know what simulator does to be able to interface. - TI simulates bit-by-bit (not convolution) using parallel simulation. - A powerful API definition should be able to support both circuit and convolution simulation. - Using [External Circuit] is a good idea. - Add ExecutableAPI as a simulator name. - Kumar pointed out that existing APIs do not support vector processing. - Would be nice to define an API that could do other types on anylysis: - eg. simulating bits with random jitter until a certain BER is achieved. - How important is assumption of linearity in convolution simulation? - Practical assumpotion that makes the math work. - Don't want to standardize the technique because something better may come along. ------------- Next meeting: Tuesday 27 Jun 2006 12:00pm PT